Friday, February 08, 2013

GAY BOY SCOUTS?


I have never been a Boy Scout but I did belong to the Boy’s Clubs of America, the branch on Livernois Avenue, south of Michigan Avenue. I was actually a camp counselor at Camp Drisulla Farwell on Harsen’s Island during one summer. I think we did what basically the Boy Scouts do, we camped, learned to swim, learned to shoot a bow and arrow and many other fun things.



I do remember one night when a counselor had to be removed from a cabin in the middle of the night because the boys in his care were somehow afraid of him and complained to the other counselors. I was only 17 but now believe we had a pedophile in camp.

The Boy Scouts of America have had their share of pedophiles becoming scout leaders and molesting scouts. In fact, the Boy Scout organization has behaved like the Catholic Church and hid decades of sexual abuse by scout leaders until finally they were forced to release thousands of documents detailing how they covered-up the abuse; thousands of lawsuits followed.

Now they are faced with pressure to allow gays into the organization as scouts and scout leaders.
They are being pressured by a changing society that sees gays as fellow humans but born with a different sexual orientation; notice I said “born with”. They are also being pressured by sponsors who are withholding monetary support due to the scout’s discriminatory policies…loss of donations hurts!

They are also being pressured by gay scouts that love scouting but hate being in a closet.

On the other hand they are also pressured by the religious right that wants the organization to stand up to those immoral people on the left.

A sad sight is seeing little boys protesting with signs displaying hateful anti-gay slogans put there by their parents and not even knowing what gay means.

The very word Boy Scout stands for honesty and a readiness to help those in need by using the skills learned while a scout; it stands for everything that is good in a person.

Boy scouts are taught to be moral and unfortunately the religious right sees homosexuality as an immoral state of being even though the problem the scouting organization has had for years is with pedophiles and not gays and here lies the dilemma.

We, as a society are facing a sea change in attitudes towards issues like homosexuality that were never imagined before and my generation (Baby Boomers) is in the midst of it. We are children of the 1960s where INCLUSION was the word of the day and not EXCLUSION; we need to be true to the revolution we started and give our grand-kids a better world to live in; a world of inclusion.




Enhanced by Zemanta

CREMATION AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH...





I found an interesting article in today’s Detroit News titled: BURIAL PREFERRED OVER CREMATION ARCHBISHOP SAYS by Oralander Brand-Williams.

In the article, Archbishop Allen Vigneron of Detroit talks about his pastoral letter IN UNION WITH CHRIST’S DYING AND RISING that is on the archdiocese’s website and will be read in in all metro Detroit churches this Sunday.

Having been raised a strict Catholic in my youth, I was quite aware that cremation was banned by the Catholic Church and that the ban was based on the belief that after death, the soul of the deceased would be eventually reunited with his/her body (resurrected) when the final or last judgment took place.

Now, in reality, this did not make any sense to me even as a young boy since who in the hell would want to unite with a decomposed body; that made me think of the movie, Night Of The Living Dead as well as other Zombie movies, etc. but hey, who was I to argue with the people that were “in the know” about such things.

So you can imagine my surprise when I went to my cousin’s funeral mass (overdose) and discovered that he was cremated. The priest conducting the service took great pains in explaining that NOW the church allows cremations…what the hell changed???

The only thing that has changed is church policy which has shifted from no cremations allowed and to cremate is a crime/sin to cremations are allowed and this occurred to my surprise in 1963…why you may ask…because the church could no longer defend a stupid belief and that Catholics were cremating their loved ones because it was cheaper and to hell with the idea of the soul reuniting with the actual body decomposing in the ground.

My aunt was cremated in Florida and her ashes sent here where we had a Catholic service for her after which we interned her in a plot at the local cemetery.

In the article by the archbishop, cremation should occur AFTER the funeral mass which was not what happened with my relatives but I guess a funeral mass with only the ashes present is OK too.

My father-in-law was a Catholic and had the Last Rites performed but was cremated and a house service held with his ashes scattered in spots he favored during life.

I guess what interests me is how centuries of rigid belief can be so easily changed without giving us the theological basis for the change. This is the same way that the concept of a PURGATORY was simply dismissed after centuries of belief together with babies going to hell if they died before being baptized which my mother really believed since she planned on baptizing my children secretly; we had them baptized anyway just to satisfy her fear…which is no longer a valid fear?

Don’t get me wrong, I think change is good for the church but change also means that the church’s pronouncements on issues like contraception, priestly celibacy, women priests, etc. should be taken with a grain of salt since they eventually will change.

I think the real reason for the archbishop’s letter is the fact that many Catholics are cremating their loved ones and holding gatherings to celebrate the life of the deceased at home thereby by-passing a church funeral service. That trend is leaving the church and the religion out of funerary customs and that does not sit well with the church.

The one surprising thing about the archbishop’s letter is the fact that he does not COMMAND how funerals need to be conducted; just suggests…interesting?



Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 03, 2013

CARDINAL VS. ARCHBISHOP IN LA...



I have written about Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles and the issue of his covering up priestly sexual abuse for many years which involved over 500 abused boys and resulted in $660 million in settlement costs before but in today’s Free Press article REBUKED EX-LA CARDINAL FIRES BACK by Gillian Flaccus of the Associated Press, we see something that has nearly never been seen before; a public squabble within the Catholic Church.

Los Angeles Archbishop Jose Gomez relieved Cardinal Mahony of all his remaining duties in the LA diocese and released thousands of documents which reveal the long standing priestly sex abuse cover-up by the cardinal who is now retired.

Cardinal Mahony took to his blog to fire back at the archbishop of LA and this is a huge and unprecedented move in the U.S. church; dueling high church officials.

There is no question that Mahony covered up the priestly sex abuse scandal as best he could but his defense for doing so is that he was “unequipped” to deal with molester priests; now what the hell does that mean?

To me, it means that many priests, bishops and cardinals are unequipped to deal with human realities because their education and training deprives them of knowing and feeling what a normal human being knows and feels; they live on a level totally disconnected from the real world.

Most religious leaders lead normal lives as husbands and fathers but not Catholic priests; they are by their compelled form of existence, freaks of nature and therefore unequipped to deal with normal human society and its laws.

Studies commissioned by U.S. bishops have found over 4,000 priests that faced allegations of sexual abuse since the early 1950s which involved over 10,000 children, mostly boys; now is that some sobering statistics or what?

I suppose that I can understand Mahony’s very public disagreement with the very public shaming he got from Gomez; no one likes being the fall guy especially when Mahony did try to mend his ways and reform the ways the church handles priestly sex abuse cases but really…he cannot undo the damage he had done to all those innocent little boys…Jesus may forgive him but no one else will; he needs to pay.

Mahony, who is 76, sees his life’s work and reputation going up in smoke and if he really believes in the religion he professes; he has to realize that he has committed grievous sins, not only in light of his religion but against humanity.

As far as church politics are concerned, this very public disagreement between two high church officials is very historic and interesting to me since it may foreshadow some type of Catholic Church reformation…here we go again…


Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, February 02, 2013

ELECTORAL VOTES: Republicans up to no good...



Politics, by its very nature, is a dirty, dirty business and I am always amazed to what lengths politicians will go to get elected or get their party elected.

The new push here in Michigan, is to get our “electoral” voting rules changed. As we all know, each state has a number of electoral votes; 16 for Michigan. These electoral votes go to the winner of the popular vote in Michigan; winner takes all.

I think we can all agree that this is inherently undemocratic since all the electoral votes go to the winner even though he or she may have won the popular vote by just one single vote.

Many contend that the electoral votes should be apportioned according to the popular vote as in percentage of the popular vote. So if you gained 50% of the popular vote you should get 50% of the electoral votes which in Michigan would equal 8 electoral votes.

I think we all would be in favor of such a policy but the Republicans are suggesting a different approach.
They have introduced legislation to award electoral votes by “congressional districts”.

Here is the problem with that plan: congressional districts are re-drawn every 10 years based on population which is as it should be BUT the party in power at that time, gets to re-draw the districts as they see fit and that party will always re-draw those districts in their favor.

The word “gerrymandering” comes into play here. It means that the party in power will re-draw voting districts to give them an edge in elections no matter how ridiculous the shape of the districts become.
If this plan was in place in 2012, Romney would have picked up 9 electoral votes and Obama 7 even though Obama won the popular vote by 10%.

Fortunately our governor who is a Republican but a smart Republican can see the inherent “unfairness” in this plan and will not allow such legislation to pass.

Unfortunately, this plan exposes the lengths politicians will go to get an edge even if it means negating the power of each individual vote…

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, February 01, 2013

ACLU: No more Support From Me!!!




I have been a supporter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) basically all my adult life but I have decided to end my support as of last year since the ACLU was using my money and the money of other supporters to challenge proposals that were voted on by citizens of Michigan, namely the proposal to mandate that race, religion or gender cannot be used as a factor in university admission policies, etc.

I have written about this in the past but now I have another reason for not supporting the ACLU: challenging RIGHT-TO-WORK legislation.

I have always expected that unions would be challenging the law but I did not think the ACLU would spearhead the challenge; I should have known that ACLU has the word UNION in its name.

Anyway, they are using the totally BULLSHIT approach by saying the law violated the state’s OPEN MEETINGS ACT, the FIRST AMENDMENT and the state constitution.

How? Because the state capital was temporarily closed during debate on the right-to-work law thereby denying “the people” access to the debate.

We all know that the state police closed the building for 2 hours because the protest was turning dangerous; they reopened the building later on.

This is total bullshit and shows how goddamn desperate the union bosses are to keep their goose that lays golden eggs for them.

Snyder is set to appoint someone to our state supreme court since one of the judges pleaded guilty to bank fraud and had to step down. He needs to appoint a judge that will tell the ACLU where to shove their case!!!

Enhanced by Zemanta

JUVENILE MURDERERS: Life without parole???





There was an issue covered in today’s paper that made me ask myself how I really felt about the issue.

It had to do with juvenile killers that are sentenced to life in prison without the chance of parole: JUVENILES GIVEN LIFE SENTENCES HAVE SHOT AT RELEASE by Robert Snell in the Detroit News.

Six months ago, the Federal Supreme Court struck down the “mandatory” no-parole sentences for first degree murder committed by individuals under the age of 18 years. We assumed the ruling would be in force going forward, but a Michigan U.S. District judge has ruled that the ruling applies retroactively.

The judge said that prisoners serving life for crimes committed as juveniles must receive a “fair and meaningful” chance at getting out of prison. Believe it or not, here in Michigan, we have 350 people serving life for a murder they committed while teenagers. The oldest is a 68 year old that has been jailed since he was 16 for a crime committed in 1962.

I have never liked anything “mandatory “as far as sentencing is concerned because I feel that it does not give the judge or jury any leeway as far as “mitigating circumstances” are concerned and certain cases may have circumstances that would cause the judge to give a sentence other than life without parole, although I don’t have any ideas what those circumstances would be; after all, a murder is a murder.

The other point that many consider is the fact that a crime, no matter how horrendous, is committed by a juvenile; a person not yet mature and given to impetuous, immature actions that through time, may actually grow up and become a responsible adult.

The case cited in the Article was that of Henry Hill, Jr. who was sentenced for a murder committed in 1980 when Hill was 16.

A psychologist said that Hill had the education level of a 3rd grader when he entered prison. Since then he has attained his GED and earned certificates in skilled trades and has finished several college classes.

Obviously, to the family of the person murdered by a juvenile, no punishment will ever return their loved one and releasing the individual that committed the murder because that individual is now a better person would certainly not sit well with the victim’s family and friends.

Can a parole board really ever be sure that a person jailed for murder as a juvenile has really been rehabilitated and will no longer be a threat to society? I seem to remember cases where very young offenders were sent to a jail for juveniles where they remained till the age of 21 and then had to be released and upon release went right back into a life of crime.

I guess I agree that juveniles imprisoned for first degree murder should, at some point, be at least granted a parole hearing and not rot under a “mandatory” life sentence but I would have to see proof that that individual is really rehabilitated and I don’t know if there is a sure way of knowing that; some may just act rehabilitated, just to get out.

Still conflicted…

Enhanced by Zemanta

CONFEDERATE MONUMENTS: Stay or Go...

Another subject that I feel needs some clarification because it is so divisive among us is the issue of Confederate Monuments, why they ...