I read a very interesting article in the Wall Street Journal
titled: THE POPE AND THE DIVORCE QUESTION by Francis X. Rocca (Sept. 26, 2014).
Recently, the pope made history (of sorts) when he married
20 couples at the Vatican with some of the couples being not perfect Catholic
couples. Some already had children, some already lived together…in other words,
they had sex before getting married; a church no no.
I think people realize that this pope is trying to bring the
Catholic Church in-line with the reality that is our society and in so doing
make the church more relevant to the needs of its members instead of having its
teachings basically ignored.
To me what the pope is trying to do is desperately
needed if the church is to continue to play a role in people’s lives.
The problem, in many cases, is the teachings or doctrines of
the church; they need to be changed or altered and yet no pope is willing to do
that since the church will appear to be wishy-washy in its pronouncements but
that is how it appears today anyway; no more purgatory, cremation OK, etc.
Pope Paul VI had an opportunity in 1968 to set a historic
precedent in changing teachings by following the suggestions of many bishops as
well as the Catholic population to allow artificial birth control
(contraception) and yet he declined to modernize the church’s views and
teachings by issuing his encyclical “Humane Vitae” which reaffirmed the ban on
contraception which exists to this very day and makes absolutely no sense in
today’s world.
Francis is in the process of canonizing Paul VI and so there
is no way he would reverse or alter the teaching of Paul’s encyclical; this
pope does appear willing to change the attitude of the church to societal
realities but will not reverse age old teachings even when they contradict new
scientific evidence and/or overall societal attitudes.
Divorce is a very common reality in our society and in the
United States the number is 50% where 50% of all marriages end in divorce.
For Catholics that want to remain true to their faith a
civil divorce does not count in the eyes of the church; you need to get an
annulment to be truly unmarried and allowed to remarry; otherwise you are
committing adultery with your new spouse and cannot accept or be given
communion.
Francis understands the realities of divorce among Catholics
and wants communion made available to them as a form of “mercy” but to do that
he would have to defy the ban on communion to those living in sin?
Francis did establish a commission tasked with easing the
rules of marriage annulment which when granted, deems a marriage was not valid
in the first place and therefore can be annulled. The pope has said that half
of Catholic marriages are probably invalid since many marry before they attain
maturity.
I guess he can water down the rules for annulment to a point
where everyone can get one for any reason and in this way get around the
scriptural demand that all marriages be forever.
Francis is obviously dancing around this issue but he has to
since the Catholic Church has painted itself into a corner on many issues of
doctrine. Since the Vatican holds itself to be the messenger of god,
interpreting what god wants to communicate to his people, it cannot just say
they got god’s message wrong.
I think they can admit they were wrong on some
issues as they have in the past and say that new evidence has shown the error
of their ways. Many in the church would never admit that and that is why I
think Francis will have a rough road in trying to make the church more human
(pastoral).
The pope can after all do whatever he wants; he answers only
to god but all popes are very aware of their legacy and the legacies of the
popes that came before them and that can influence their actions.
I admire Francis for at least addressing issues that were
off the table for previous popes and I hope he can appoint enough like-minded
cardinals who will then elect a like-minded pope after his death; history will
definitely remember what he started.
No comments:
Post a Comment