CATHOLIC CHURCH: Stem cell research...

Image via Wikipedia

Toledo’s Catholic bishop, Leonard Blair, discouraged parishes and schools from raising money for the Susan G. Komen Foundation which supports breast cancer research.

The bishop stated that the foundation “was open to embryonic stem research and may very well fund such research in the future” and money should be directed at organizations the Church approves of.

Embryonic research (stem cell) is against Catholic teaching.

The Komen Foundation is trying to help real women with real problems, said a U of M stem cell researcher.

Since my sister and various other members of our circle have had breast cancer and some did not survive, I have a special interest in curing the disease and we have participated in many “Relays for Life” to gather funds for research to get this disease under control.

I won’t go into any technical details about stem cell research but to say that the potential is huge. And if anyone suggests to you that there has been no progress made with this type of research, they are very ignorant of the medical facts out there; miracle cures are already being documented.

My problem with the Church is its continued worship of the embryo as a potential human (even if the embryos were to be thrown away anyway) and totally ignoring the plights of adult, human beings that are in need of medical help. I can understand if babies are being killed for their cells but that is just plainly absurd.

Again, Church leaders that don’t have a clue as to the science of stem cell research are making decisions based on ignorance and superstition and that is influencing how some Catholics view things and how they behave, as in not financially supporting research that has such great potential for them and their loved ones.

The Catholic stand on stem cell research is thankfully not shared by many Catholics especially those that have family members with breast cancer. My sister is a super Catholic but she follows common sense thinking and just ignores the inane gibberish coming out of those men with the pointy hats.

The quote “helping real; women with real problems” is at the core of this issue; the Church is more concerned with their invented dogma than with real, suffering human beings and that says a lot.

Related articles

• Toledo bishop: Parishes can't fund Komen (dispatch.com)
• Stem Cell Research (healthyours.wordpress.com)
• Heroic News: "Planned Parenthood comedy show raises temperatures" plus 7 more (deaconjohnspace.wordpress.com)
• Two Patients Undergo Stem-Cell Blindness Treatment (technologyreview.in)
• The Great Debate Over Stem Cell Research (campbellzc.wordpress.com)
• Stem cell therapies move into the real world (newscientist.com)
• Lung Stem Cells Isolated (lezgetreal.com)
• Stem Cells Exactly Know Their Path: Mcmaster Researchers (medicalnewstoday.com)
• Dr Farjo BBC News 24 interview about new stem cell research and hair transplant surgery (chanaview.wordpress.com)

OBAMA: No time for ideology...action needed.

Image via Wikipedia

This morning President Obama left a meeting at the White House in a huff and said he will not compromise on “raising the debt limit” by abandoning the tax increase on the rich proposal “even if it means the end to his presidency…” them are strong words indeed.

Many have said that the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy cannot and should not be allowed to continue because we just can’t afford those cuts any more. Many also say that we are taxed at record low rates so why not increase the rates for those that can afford it.

The arguments are well founded and under normal circumstances, I would agree with them BUT we are not in normal circumstances. Yes, Ronald Reagan raised taxes in a recession but he didn’t face a housing scenario that we have today. Under Reagan, the recession was just a normal economic cycle whereas today, we have a depression that has no precedents in history; we are in uncharted waters.

My big objection to raising taxes (even on the wealthy) is that it makes Democrats continue to play their spending games and will not get serious about cutting the government’s spending. As long as they can increase taxes, they will not cut spending as deeply as they need to be cut.

This may well be Obama’s only term as president and it is not only because he wants to raise taxes so badly; he has failed in other areas of the economy for ideological reasons. Instead of doing what economists indicate needs to be done, he plays around politically, supporting unions and spending on programs that do not work.

He needs to stop playing politics and get down to business. I realize that the Republicans are playing politics but they are the opposition and that is what a party in opposition does. He is the president and party ideology should not matter to him at this time; he needs to do what needs to be done period.

Related articles

• Political tensions rise as debt talks continue at White House (cnn.com)
• Hat-Gip - Again with the Reagan references (politico.com)
• Olive: America's tyranny of yokels (thestar.com)
• It's Obama's problem, until the checks don't go out (sfgate.com)
• 'C'mon, Man!' Exclaims VP in Deficit Meeting. 'Let's Get Real!' (blogs.abcnews.com)
• Obama on Debt: 'Enough Is Enough' - Fox News (news.google.com)
• Bennet Kelley: Debt Ceiling 101: The 5 Things You Should Know (huffingtonpost.com)
• Trying to break a stalemate (whitehouse.blogs.cnn.com)
• Obama warns Cantor: 'Don't call my bluff' in debt talks (thehill.com)
• Oh my: Angry Obama storms out of debt-ceiling negotiations; Update: "This may bring my presidency down, but I will not yield on this" (hotair.com)

DETROIT: Head Start money wasted all these years...Feds wake up.

Image via Wikipedia

A new headline “Detroit may lose control of Head Start” is an admission from the federal government that Detroit is hopelessly broken and the millions of dollars that have been administered by the city for the last 20 years to help 7,000 children get a “head start” on their education was a waste of time and money.

The feds accused Detroit departments that handled the program (Human Services) with improper accounting (read corruption); extravagant spending (read corruption) and failed oversight (read incompetence).

You can lament the loss of all those taxpayer dollars but more damaging is the ineffective use of those dollars to help poor children get a head start in their lives.

One bright spot is that finally the federal government (under the first black president) is not simply dumping taxpayer dollars into a poor city but actually asking for accountability; Barak is no Lyndon B. Johnson it appears.

Related articles

• Ax Head Start: Ending Programs That Don't Yield Results (time.com)
• Time to Ax Public Programs That Don't Yield Results (time.com)
• A must read for all!! Think about all of this!! (pauls2k.wordpress.com)

NEW LOW FOR OBAMA: Using Social Security checks as hostages...

Image by Tony the Misfit via Flickr

I was very disappointed to hear that President Obama has resorted to cheap scare tactics to get his way with the debt-ceiling fiasco.

He stated that if he does not get his way, Social Security checks to 70 million elderly, veterans and people on disability may not go out next month.

This is a new low for him and I am embarrassed for him and his party.

The issue of taxing the rich should not even be on the table at this time. No tax proposals should even be discussed at this time.

The Democrats are playing their usual socialist game but in times of financial jeopardy as we are in right now, taxation is not a tool that can be used.

The Democrats want the Republicans to take the blame for shutting the government down but they are the ones that are not compromising on taxes and if they think they took a drubbing in the last election; they may not be any Democrats left after the next election.

Related articles

• Obama Holds Retirees and Vets Hostage to Debt Negotiations (treeofmamre.wordpress.com)
• Obama: If We Don't Get a Deal, I Can't Guarantee We'll Be Sending Out Social Security Checks on August 3rd (michellemalkin.com)
• Obama Warns on Social Security, Veterans' Checks (blogs.wsj.com)
• There's Finally One Guy In Washington Who's Talking Sense On The Deficit -- Too Bad Everyone Else Just Wants To Get Reelected (businessinsider.com)
• Gingrich Urges Republicans to Call Obama's Bluff on Social Security Scare (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
• Senior scare - Obama: SS checks in jeopardy (politico.com)
• Earl Ofari Hutchinson: The GOP's Debt Ceiling War Not About Debt But About Obama (huffingtonpost.com)
• Senate Republicans Considering Back-Door Debt Ceiling Increase (businessinsider.com)

COUNSELING DEGREE: To counsel gays or not...do I have to?

Image via Wikipedia

Some time ago I wrote about a student at Eastern Michigan University that sued the university because the school kicked her off their COUNSELING program when she refused to counsel gays due to her deeply held religious beliefs. At the time, our Republican attorney general joined her suit in support against the university.

I stated then that the MICHIGAN attorney general has no place in filing a friend of the court motion because he represents the citizens of Michigan and the suit is between a student and her university but he just could not keep his religious and political nose out of the case.

In 2010 a federal judge ruled for the university which claimed the student did not fulfill her curricular requirements and for not following the American Counseling Association’s code of ethics. She is appealing, egged on by the religious right no doubt.

I stated then that I have a friend that is deeply religious and also would not counsel gays among others BUT she attended a religious school that gave her a degree in counseling and did not require her to counsel gays as part of her graduation requirement.

I feel that any student that enrolls in a graduate program that clearly states what is required for graduation MUST follow those stated requirements or leave the program without a degree. Since the university clearly states what is required for graduation and all students are aware of those requirements, the university can toss the student out when those requirements are not met…duh.

BUT NOW, a Michigan Democratic state senator (Tupac Hunter) has introduced a bill in the Michigan Senate that would allow counseling students to decline to counsel gays based on their religious beliefs or moral convictions. Hunter was asked if students can decline to counsel blacks because it is somehow against their principles? Hunter, who is black, did not see the connection...

Here I state again that if you are so bloody religious, you should go to a religious school to get your diploma in counseling; plain and simple instead of balking at actions you knew were required by the university.

I think counseling is an important field that benefits many individuals that desperately need help in managing their lives; I have known people that benefited from wise counseling but of course I know people that received bad counseling and for this reason, I feel a strong program curriculum is paramount in creating a good and effective counselor and I trust the school to know what is needed to produce such counselors.

I think politicians should stay the hell out of matters that don’t concern them but of course, state funding for universities is a big hammer to hold over a university’s head and so they must meekly comply or pay the price.

I knew we were going to have problems with Republicans in the state; we elected them to fix our finances but we should have known that their religious agenda was not going away and now even the Democrats are getting involved; they must feel most voters in Michigan are religious nuts and elect other religious nuts…

Related articles

• Wayne Besen: The Religious Right's Shadow Nation (huffingtonpost.com)
• Free College Resources Help You Meet College Demands (education.com)
• A Profile in Stupidity (vgiordano.wordpress.com)

PROPOSAL 2: ACLU wasted my money...no more...

Image via Wikipedia

This Sunday’s papers also drew many letters to the editor defending the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals that found Michigan’s Proposal 2 (against affirmative action) unconstitutional.

The Detroit Free Press, a liberal paper, uncharacteristically came out against the ruling. I also decried the ruling based on the 14^th Amendment to the constitution, especially the “Equal Protection…” section.

Today’s letters help me understand better the basis of the ruling. The NAACP and the ACLU challenged the fact that the Proposal, passed by popular vote, was incorporated into the Michigan Constitution, which is basically impossible to overturn, especially for a minority.

Now hang in there with me as I try to understand this.  “The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly explained that a state law is unconstitutional when it makes it more difficult for minority groups to achieve legislation that is in their best interest”.

So I suppose, if we did not write this into the Michigan Constitution but left it as a plain Michigan law, it would be constitutional?

Imran J. Syed of Canton argues that minority interests can never be protected via popular vote. If that was the case, Southern states would have never outlawed slavery or Jim Crow.

On the other hand, Raymond Dubin of Farmington Hills argues that Proposal 2 banned the use of racial and gender preferences related to public employment, public education and public contracting. If anything, it mandated that all Michigan citizens be treated fairly and equally.

Kary L. Moss, ACLU of Michigan, you cannot remove race from consideration in admissions, yet allow nonacademic factors such as geographical diversity, legacy status and athletics. I don’t think she understands that all those nonacademic factors apply to all applicants and not to only minorities or non-minorities.

I still think that discrimination is discrimination, whether against minorities or non-minorities, it should be against the law and affirmative action is discrimination against those it does not include in granting preference.

As I have mentioned before, the ACLU has lost my support over this because the money spent trying to find a loophole in the Constitution that would allow affirmative action to come back is not only a waste of donor (me) money but an attempt to blunt the will of the people in 2011 (not the same as 1865) who demand equality for all.

Related articles

• Michigan Proposal 2 (2006) Revisited... (jmszyszko.blogspot.com)
• Saving Affirmative Action from Itself (3quarksdaily.com)
• Governor files legal opinion against ban on affirmative action (latimesblogs.latimes.com)
• Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (volokh.com)
• Michigan constitutional amendment struck down because it tries to guarantee equality too much (whynotnashville.wordpress.com)
• Divided appeals court strikes down Michigan's affirmative action ban (paralegalsandiego.wordpress.com)
• Reversing discrimination (americanunion.wordpress.com)
• Michigan's Ban on Race in College Admission Ruled Illegal (theroot.com)
• Mich. ban on race in college admissions illegal (cbsnews.com)
• Court Rejects Michigan's Affirmative Action Ban (newser.com)

ATHEISTS: They have a need to advertise their message?

Image via Wikipedia

A couple of weeks ago MITCH ALBOM, a respected writer for the Detroit Free Press devoted a whole column to the subject of atheist advertising. The column titled:” If God made the sky, can atheist fly it” and took atheists to task for flying banners advertising their message on the 4^th of July.

An example of one of their ads was a billboard shown in the paper where a smiling young man says “I can be good without God” and the sponsor is the Freedom From Religion Foundation.

Well Albom got an earful this Sunday from many letter writers including my favorite, Harry T. Cook; an Episcopalian Minister retired who champions religious “doubt”.

Harry reminds Albom that our Founders created a secular state because they knew full well the damage caused by institutional religions and their theologies to societies and nations and that is a fact that we forget today. He also reminded Albom that an atheist is a-theist i.e. one that cannot and will not confess belief in a deity of theism because NO DEPENDABLE DATA exist on which to base such a belief.

George Shiffer, American Atheists, Allen Park, talks about Albom’s complaint that the atheists are trying to shove their views down our throats. Excuse me; you don’t think Christians haven’t been shoving their shit down everybody’s throat like forever?

They forced “under God” into our pledge when the original Pledge did not contain that phrase thereby eliminating non-believers from “one nation indivisible”. They forced “In God We Trust” onto our money. They are forcing Bible study and the absurd Intelligent Design into our public schools and make no excuses for trying to force Christianity into our government and schools. What do you say to that Albom?

I have been following this trend of atheists, agnostics and plain humanists, trying to get their message out through advertising using the common channels for advertising; billboards, flying banners, etc.

I don’t totally understand this since those organizations are not trying to convince anyone about the myth that is institutional religion. I do think they maybe trying to reach people that are confused and don’t know that there are people who are not believers and that these people are good and positive members of society because they genuinely care about humanity and not because they want to find a good spot in the afterlife.

I have also seen ads basically saying “You are not alone with your doubt about God and religion”.

I have studied religion for many, many years and considered the study of religious doubt as something only scholars engaged in and discussions on the subject remained far away from the public view but I guess the time has come, or people feel the time has come, to break out into the open and engage the public.

Churches are obviously angry about efforts to sow doubt into paying parishioners but they have nothing to fear; the hard core religious are just that, hard core but reports are in,  saying that more and more people consider themselves agnostics if not full atheists, so maybe it is time to engage the public.

Related articles

• Mitch Albom Doesn't Get It (friendlyatheist.com)
• Christians Refuse To Fly Atheist Banners (hooglyboogly.co)
• Liberal Host Thom Hartmann Takes On Atheist Leader Over July 4th 'Evangelical' Campaign (mediaite.com)
• Priest Advocates Taking Up Intellectual Arms Against Advancing Atheist Horde (atheistrev.com)
• 5 Faulty Arguments Religious People Use Against Atheists (Debunked) (gretachristina.typepad.com)
• Atheist Billboard in Columbus, Ohio Taken Down After Church Complains (friendlyatheist.com)
• Ask an Atheist Answers (latinone.wordpress.com)
• A redefinition of "atheist" (whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com)

ECONOMY: Democrats need to stop looking to increase taxes...

Image via Wikipedia

I think we all heard the poor jobless report and about unemployment inching back up to 9.2. Things are not looking so rosy for the economy or for Obama if he doesn’t change tactics and starts doing what is needed and not be playing his ideological games (socialism / unionism).

I have already mentioned how Obama will not sign free trade pacts with Korea, Panama and Columbia which will boost our exports and create jobs, without spending billions on a union retraining bill that has been proven to be expensive and ineffective.

I think we can all agree that tax loopholes for corporations should be closed; once closed it will produce extra revenue for the government.

Stop regulating the shit out of business. New regulations that will add expenses to existing businesses should be postponed. I think Congress has moved on this issue and so has the president but it is all talk at this point; no action.

The battle in Congress about raising the debt ceiling is pretty heated right now but I think it hinges on only one point; TAXES.

The Democrats insist on raising taxes on the rich to avoid cuts to their favorite domestic programs and the Republicans say NO NEW TAXES.

Here is the problem I have with adding new taxes in a down economy (depression); you cannot take money out of a down economy; FDR did it and he caused a depression within a depression. FDR also spent massive amounts of money on projects to create jobs and that did not work either as it is NOT WORKING NOW.

A normal person in financial difficulties CUTS HIS SPENDING. No more movies, restaurant dinners, expensive toys, vacations, whatever it takes to stabilize the situation. The government is not different. We have identified countless billions of dollars spent on programs that are just a waste of our money; cut them.

Democrats are making a big deal about not touching Social Security and Medicare and will use that against the Republicans in 2012 BUT THEY MUST BE TOUCHED; THEY ARE UNSUSTAINABLE.

That does not mean eliminating them just making small changes that will save billions.

MEDICARE: Right now there is a salary limit on which Medicare deductions apply; raise the limit. Also, up the age at which Medicare kicks in to 66 and up it more in the future when people will work longer due to better health, etc.

The problem with the Democrats is that they want to soak the rich to pay for their pet welfare projects and what needs to happen is for them to CUT their pet welfare projects and I stand with the Republicans on this issue because raising taxes is not good for our current economy.

Related articles

• Medicare recipients could be affected in debt deal (sfgate.com)
• A rundown of what could be put in the Obama-GOP debt deal (thehill.com)
• Sessions: Dem tax demands killing debt deal (cbsnews.com)
• No free pass for Medicare recipients in debt talks (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Partisan rhetoric may shrink deficit aspirations (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

MALAYSIA: The time has come...

Image via Wikipedia

I don’t ever remember writing about MALAYSIA before but the country is in the news and I have a special reason for following events there.

I travelled to Malaysia years ago on a business trip. It was a very, very long journey to get there and when I arrived at 4AM and stepped outside, I knew I was in trouble. The temperature in Kuala Lumpur at 4AM was in the 90s so what should I expect when the sun came out.

Malaysia is officially Muslim and it was long pants and long sleeved shirts and a temperature over 100°F; I thought I was going to die of heat stroke. We ate in open air restaurants with our fingers with the meals served on palm leaves…interesting?

Anyway, the country is a constitutional monarchy and a democracy with elections but there were problems. The indigenous population is MALAY with large populations of Chinese and Hindu Indians mainly from the south of India.

All laws are biased towards the Malays. In fact only Malay can head a company so Chinese and Indian companies have to hire a Malay CEO and pay him even though he is just a figure head and does not actually run anything…strange?

I knew that this form of autocratic government would be challenged in future years and it seems the time has arrived. The New York Times among other media, are reporting that Malaysians are asking for election reforms and are protesting in public to have their voices heard.

Nearly 2,000 protesters were arrested and tear gas and water cannon were used to disperse the protesters but I think that just like in the Middle East, people are fed up with autocratic governments and want the winds of freedom to start blowing in their direction and I applaud their efforts.

The news accounts did not specify the ethnic make-up of the protestors and just called them Malaysians but I know that Malays are treated better by the government than other ethnicities so I don’t think they were the ones trying to improve the election process…I will do more digging.

I have many great stories from my visit and one is that the Malay women are beautiful and even though some of them wear the Islamic burquas, their faces remain uncovered and are made-up. I found that fascinating that these women have only the face to work with to show off their beauty…and they do a great job of it.

Related articles

• Thousands Protest in Malaysia's Capital (censorshipinamerica.com)
• The Day After BERSIH2.0′s Walk for Democracy: Soul Searching for Malaysia (dinmerican.wordpress.com)
• Malaysian Police Make 1,667 Arrests in Kuala Lumpur Protests (businessweek.com)
• Malaysian Police Fire Tear Gas at Kuala Lumpur Protesters (businessweek.com)
• Tear Gas Erupts as Malaysia Detains 1,600 Protesters (globalspin.blogs.time.com)
• Malaysia All Screwed-Up (thinkaloudtoday.wordpress.com)
• Why do Japanese hate Chinese, and Chinese hate Malay? (eekaa.wordpress.com)
• Chinese 2nd Class Citizens (snoopyjnr.com)
• Malaysia's dilemma: Can it reform and discriminate? (malaysiasdilemma.wordpress.com)
• Malaysia: Some votes are more valuable than others (malaysiasdilemma.wordpress.com)
• World: RACE WAR IN MALAYSIA (time.com)

DETROIT: Kwame blames others for his downfall as expected...

Image via Wikipedia

This Sunday’s newspapers are just chockfull of stories about subjects that I usually comment on.

The first one is by Nolan Finley of the Detroit News titled: “Kwame keeps hurting Detroit” and is about the book the former mayor of Detroit wrote while in jail which the sale of, he is hoping, will make him some money. A judge in Detroit made it mandatory that any proceeds from the sale of the book will go to paying his fine to the city of Detroit.

Some excerpts from the book have surface and I am not surprised that he lays the blame for his downfall on “white” people (add Jewish) out to destroy the city of Detroit and its African-American leaders.

Nolan Finley states that the city of Detroit has been run entirely by black people for the last 35 years and they were fully empowered to run the city and why in the hell would “white” people want to destroy Detroit; what would they gain?

Finley points out that it was the white business community that supported Kwame and even bailed his ass out (Karamanos) by giving him a paying job when he was thrown out of office.

I have been talking about the culture of incompetence and corruption in the City of Detroit for years and for Kilpatrick to lay the blame for his greed and corruption and eventual downfall on some white conspiracy is just absurd and stupid but… not a surprise.

Our new mayor Dave Bing is having a hell of a time turning the city around because the culture is so entrenched; Obama is having to send federal workers to take over the jobs that Detroiters cannot seem manage.

Detroiters on the other hand, are trying to repeal the Emergency Manager Law which the governor passed specifically to clean up the mess the “culture” caused in the last number of years, as if to say that they like the way things are and want the gravy train of corruption to continue but who is to pay for that gravy train when the cupboards are bare?

Detroiters object to the dictatorial powers the emergency manager has which they claim negate their power to elect officials they choose. Judging by the choices Detroiters have made in those years, they deserve and need a dictator if the city is to survive at all.

Related articles

• Kwame's Tell All Book-Is He Really Singing For His Supper? (wycd.radio.com)
• Ex-Detroit mayor's book covers affair, legal saga (thegrio.com)

MOVIES: Two that are recommended...

There were two (2) movies that I have seen recently that deserve mention; they were so good.

The first one was LITTLE RED RIDING HOOD and I know, it’s a kid’s tale well don’t let real young kids see it, it will scare the hell out of them.

Yes it involves a werewolf and yes she does wear a red riding hood and there is a dream scene where the famous words “What big teeth you have” etc. are actually spoken but the story and the way the movie was filmed, is just plain fantastic AND it had us guessing to the very end. It is NOT a cartoon.

The other is THE WARRIOR’S WAY which is a standard story of a great Japanese swordsman who wins many battles, etc. but there is a twist to the story when the scene switches to a lawless town out in the Wild West.

It is not only filmed in a new way that probably uses the best of digital technology but the story is told in a new way that sharply departs from what we are used to and I like it.

Hope you have a big HD TV because it is best viewed on one but no matter what type of TV, the films will definitely please you…highly recommended.

Related articles

• Film Review: Red Riding Hood (2011) (koolksfilmblog.wordpress.com)
• (Little) Red Riding Hood - Beware the wolf! (livechronicles.wordpress.com)
• Red Riding Hood : Movie (mirlz.wordpress.com)
• Red Riding Hood (2011) (ebigmedia.wordpress.com)

YELLOWSTONE NAT. PARK: Grizzly kills man hiking there...

Image via Wikipedia

Recently, I talked about our huge adventure to Yellowstone so it was with amazement and trepidation that we read about a hiker in Yellowstone that was fatally mauled by a grizzly.

The attack occurred in an area WE visited. When we were there, many signs were posted telling us to beware of bears, especially bears with cubs since they will attack when they feel their cubs are in danger. In fact, many trails were closed because a nursing bear was spotted in the area.

The couple that was attacked has been to Yellowstone four times and was aware of the warnings. When we were there, a record amount of snow had fallen throughout the winter and was still on the ground in some parts even though it was nearly June. That snowfall prevented the bears from moving to higher elevations, away from trails and humans.

The warning is to NEVER SURPRIZE a mother bear with cubs and so on our hikes we made a lot of noise. You are also suppose to carry “bear spray” and we bought some BUT I don’t know if I would stand and wait for a charging grizzly to come close enough for me to use the spray; I definitely would have soiled myself long before he got close.

The couple spotted the grizzly and cubs 100 yards ahead and turned around immediately and started walking / running away and the grizzly caught up with the man who yelled for his wife to run. What she did was play dead and after picking her up by her backpack, the grizzly wandered off.

We were debating on what we would have done in the same situation recounting all the instructions by park rangers BUT the instructions are confusing: play dead, fetal position, prone position, stand your ground they are only bluffing, etc. We came to the conclusion that we should carry a “bear gun” whenever we go hiking in bear country but you can’t carry weapons while travelling unless you drove to Wyoming…not likely.

Related articles

• Fatal Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Attack Is First in 25 years (blippitt.com)
• How to Not Get Eaten (thedailybeast.com)
• Yellowstone grizzly bear attack victim identified (summitcountyvoice.com)
• Yellowstone won't try to capture killer grizzly (cbsnews.com)
• Park rangers: Bear in mauling only protecting cubs (seattletimes.nwsource.com)

DETROIT: The FEDS have to do it because Detroiters don't know how?

Image via Wikipedia

Metro and State | Federal government to help direct Detroit's rebuilding | The Detroit News

I would be embarrassed if I was mayor of Detroit and could not find capable, responsible Detroiters to fill jobs in city government. Obama is sending teams of federal employees to do the job Detroiters just cannot seem to do...what does that tell you?

CASEY ANTHONY CASE: Don't blame the jurors for doing their job...

Image via Wikipedia

Since the jury found Casey Anthony not guilty all I have heard is rants about the jury members and about our judicial system but today I have heard from some jurors and they made sense.

They said she is probably guilty but the prosecutors did such a piss poor job of proving she killed her daughter that no fair minded, sane person would have convicted her on bullshit suppositions by an idiot team of prosecutors that did not have any evidence to begin with.

Warner Spitz (pathologist here) said the prosecutors could not even say what Caylee died from and if they could not say definitely that she died as a result of a homicide or drowning or anything, she might as well have died of natural causes. Ask yourself, how can you punish someone for a crime that they don’t even know happened since there WAS NO CAUSE OF DEATH.

Yeah, people want desperately to blame somebody but you can’t just pick somebody you think did it and send them to an electric chair; we have laws that require proof before you fry somebody BUT…

And I have been saying this for a long time; the problem in our judicial system is the prosecutors who don’t seem to want justice and fairness…they just want to convict somebody, anybody…evidence does not matter just a good bullshit story…

Related articles

• Featured: Should the American public be in uproar over the Casey Anthony verdict? (michellereed.org)
• The Casey Anthony verdict: The jury did the right thing (thegreatone22.wordpress.com)
• Casey Anthony needs help, alternate juror says (cbsnews.com)
• Innocent Until Proven Guilty? (deaconcast.com)
• Casey Anthony Trial Shows the Limits of Forensic Science in Proving How a Child Died (propublica.org)

PROSECUTORS AT IT AGAIN: Casey Anthony case...

Image by CHARMERS ❤'S LILY ROSE via Flickr

Casey Anthony has been acquitted by the jury of murdering her daughter but was guilty of lying to investigators on several occasions.

I think everyone that followed this case knew the prosecutors had no evidence so WHY TRY HER FOR FIRST DEGREE MURDER?

This is exactly what I have been talking about; prosecutors will try to convict you and even send you to death row while knowing there is no evidence to prove decidedly that you are indeed guilty. The jury saw the lack of evidence right away and acquitted her quickly.

What if the jury members were twits and bought the “hypothetical” explanation offered by prosecutors as to what really happened? Would she be convicted of first degree murder based on a hypothetical explanation and potentially sentenced to death?

It appears that this is true and therefore I say there is a major problem with how we charge people with crimes and how we try them in court.

Prosecutors have to get permission to try someone for a crime and that permission should be given based on evidence of a crime so how did they get permission to try Anthony based on what?

I understand “probable cause” but what then?

Related articles

• Casey Anthony acquitted of murder (thegreatone22.wordpress.com)
• Casey Anthony cleared of murder in daughter's death (ctv.ca)
• Breaking... Verdict Reached in Casey Anthony Trial (skydancingblog.com)

PROSECUTORS: Need to be punished...

Image via Wikipedia

I have often stated that PROSECUTORS, at all levels, do not have justice as their first priority but conviction at any price; a good conviction record means a good resume, good enough to run for the next higher office.

We now are aware of countless convicted men that were later exonerated by DNA evidence or just the discovery of prosecutorial misconduct during the trial. Many men were on death row when they were freed.

The latest case involves a similar story about John Thompson who spent 18 years in jail, 14 of which were on death row for a murder and carjacking of which he was later exonerated.

A private investigator discovered that the assistant district attorney kept “exculpatory” (to clear one of guilt) evidence from the defense attorney. In other words, this prosecutor who knew the evidence he had would clear Thompson, hid it on purpose just to get a conviction; send an innocent man to death…can you believe it?

Thompson sued the Orleans Parish district attorney’s office for allowing one of their prosecutors to withhold evidence that would have cleared him and railroading him onto death row. He won a jury verdict awarding him $14 million dollars but the case eventually found its way to the Supreme Court; which is rare.

The district attorney’s office argued that it was a “rogue prosecutor” or “miscreant prosecutor” who was at fault and not the district attorney’s office. The Supreme Court’s conservative judges agreed with the district attorney’s argument and nullified all previous rulings including a favorable ruling by the 5^th Circuit Court.

I won’t go into the legal mumbo-jumbo but to say the court split along ideological lines; conservatives vs. liberals.

My point is what about Mr. Thompson’s lost 18 years? What about the mental anguish of being on death row? What about his children that did not have a father those 18 years and thought their father was a murderer? Where is justice for this man? He even said it was not about the money but how could this have happened; why is this allowed?

The Supreme Court stated that the New Orleans District Attorney’s office could not be held responsible for what occurred and my question is WHO IS TO BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT HAPPENED? The fact that the original prosecutor (now dead) and three (3) other prosecutors plus the lab that tested the evidence, knew the evidence existed and was not being given to the defense, proves that people were responsible for the crime against Mr. Thompson.

The conservative bloc of the Supreme Court, in this case, failed to provide justice and more importantly, failed to send a message to all U.S. prosecutors that unlawful behavior on their part will not be tolerated and a price will be extracted from those prosecutors that behave in this way and from the office that employs these prosecutors and has a responsibility to supervise these “miscreant prosecutors”.

MICHIGAN PROPOSAL 2 (2006) REVISITED...

Image via Wikipedia

Some years back we battled the issue of using race to grant preferential treatment in university admission policies; affirmative action.

In Michigan, we banned affirmative action in 2006 when we voted in Proposal 2 and also the Supreme Court stated that banning affirmative action is constitutional.

So why did the 6^th Circuit Court of Appeals declare Proposal 2 and what it stands for “unconstitutional”?

I did not know that the NAACP and ACLU of Michigan (no more support from me) filed a lawsuit in 2006 to overturn Proposal 2 and it has taken all this time for the court to finally make a decision.

At the time of passage of Proposal 2, people worried that minorities would be eliminated from entering universities since they could not compete with better educated “white” students. Well that turned out to be total bullshit and minority admissions are on the rise after falling for a few years.

The very thought of giving preference in university admissions due to race or gender is absurd and unfair; merit should be the only determinant in an admission policy and I think minorities and non-minorities would tend to agree.

Anyway, we voted in 2006 and the Supreme Court agreed with us so what in the hell is this all about.

It appears that the court based its argument on AMENDMENT XIV and the “EQUAL PROTECTION” clause. This amendment is one of a batch of amendments passed after the Civil War to protect the rights of newly freed Negro slaves as well as other matters.

The section of the amendment in question was phrased in a vague manner specifically so as to give each generation room for interpretation as it pertains to their specific issues…what?

“…No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; or shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

To the court, Proposal 2 somehow abridged the privileges of specific individuals; minorities. BUT privileges are NOT granted to just specific individuals, they have to be shared by ALL citizens. So Proposal 2 is not taking away anything from anybody, it is making sure all is fair and equal for ALL citizens.

The fact that the Court of Appeals has decided to base their arguments on bullshit instead of common sense makes me have less and less regard for judges that try to push a personal agenda, “activist judges”, by trashing what the Constitution writers intended EVEN given the wide latitude of interpretation offered by the generality of the amendment.

The Detroit Free Press, as liberal as they come, said the court’s ruling does not hold water…

Related articles

• Court Rejects Michigan's Affirmative Action Ban (newser.com)
• Divided appeals court strikes down Michigan's affirmative action ban (paralegalsandiego.wordpress.com)
• Michigan constitutional amendment struck down because it tries to guarantee equality too much (whynotnashville.wordpress.com)
• Mich. ban on race in college admissions illegal (cbsnews.com)
• Court overturns Michigan affirmative action ban (thegrio.com)

DOMINIQUE STRAUSS - KHAN RELEASED: Shame on us?

Image via Wikipedia

I remember we were all so pleased to see DOMINIQUE STRAUSS-KAHN, the French president of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and famous womanizer get caught for allegedly trying to rape a poor, ignorant cleaning lady from Africa.

I remember writing how Khan has always managed to escape any punishment for his many sexual misadventures due to the structure of French law and his “important status” in world affairs. I called it a cultural clash of the high-and-mighty rules of French society and the American legal system that does not care who you are; same justice for all.

Well, I should have obeyed my own total mistrust of prosecutors, no matter where they may come from; they really don’t care about truth and justice; they care about a big conviction rate which will help them run for the next higher political office.

Kahn was released from house arrest because there seem to be some irregularities with the poor, ignorant cleaning lady from Africa. There is evidence that a sexual encounter did occur between Kahn and the cleaning lady but was it forced or consensual?

It appears that the 32 year-old cleaning lady from Guinea has not been quite as truthful as first thought and she may have been lying about many other things including being involved in drug smuggling and money laundering.

My wife asked that if she is not the innocent cleaning woman as was first thought BUT was sexually assaulted against her will, is that still a crime even if she is a criminal herself? Well I would think so even though her credibility is now shot and the defense cab just call her a liar and trying to extort money from the wealthy Mr. Kahn and that is all she wrote…

The Manhattan district attorney in charge of the prosecution is Cyrus Vance, Jr. son of the great Cyrus Vance who served Presidents Kennedy, Johnson and Carter. Junior (56) is not looking so good right now and his quest for higher office may have stalled somewhat as it should…

My problem is more with loosing face in the cultural war with France and Europe. Our system maybe is not better than theirs even though I think it is and we may have “rushed” to convict without getting all our marbles in order.

The French will also say that we “ridiculed” and “embarrassed” a famous man like Kahn who was suppose to run for president of France, for no good reason; we are hot heads clamoring for headlines…not so civilized as in Europe after all…

Related articles

• Manhattan D.A. Cyrus Vance Accountable for DSK Debacle (reason.com)
• Ex-IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn freed without bail (justsimplyinlove.wordpress.com)
• Case Against Former IMF Chief Falling Apart (theroot.com)
• DSK case collapsing: Was this just French politics to kill his Presidential aspirations? (ktwop.wordpress.com)
• Who Set Up Dominique Strauss Kahn ??? (2012patriot.wordpress.com)
• Implosion Of Strauss-Kahn Case Just The Latest Embarrassment For Manhattan DA (newyork.cbslocal.com)
• NO SURPRISE 'MUSLIM' MAID LIED! Prosecutors agree to free Dominique Strauss-Kahn on his own recognizance (barenakedislam.wordpress.com)
• Perhaps Strauss-Kahn Really WAS Set Up? (skydancingblog.com)

Thaddeus McCotter: MY Rep. running for president?

Image via Wikipedia

This morning’s paper reported that THADDEUS McCotter, my REPUBLICAN representative in Congress has declared himself in the running for president of the United States.

I don’t think he has a snowball’s chance in hell of getting the nomination so why is he running?

I will admit that I have voted for him in the past even though I had issues with some of his positions but there was no one else to vote for since the Democrats who opposed him were worthless.

McCotter seems to be an opportunist which most politicians are and stands up for any issue that will get him re-elected.

He supported Bush in the Iraq War when I was against it. He supported auto company bailouts even though his Republican cohorts were ALL against them. He even supported a pro-union bill when ALL his Republican buddies voted against it. In other words, he makes great arguments for his Republican / conservative views but then he votes against them and for that he wants the Republicans to nominate him to run for president?

One of his biggest negatives is that he is totally unknown in the country and what better way to get known is to run for president and get that media attention that he needs to maybe make a run next time?

Related articles

• No joke: Thaddeus McCotter is running for president. Seriously. (dailykos.com)
• Thaddeus McCotter for President? (outsidethebeltway.com)
• Rep. Thaddeus McCotter To Announce Presidential Run (alan.com)
• Daily Benefactor News - GOP Rep. Thaddeus McCotter To Launch Bid For Presidency (thedaleygator.wordpress.com)
• Thaddeus McCotter Declares for President July 2nd (minx.cc)
• More McCotter For Prez Talk (nicedeb.wordpress.com)
• Let's All Start Speculating About Thaddeus McCotter In 2012! (huffingtonpost.com)
• President Thaddeus? (capitolhillblue.com)
• Video: Thaddeus McCotter On Huckabee (nicedeb.wordpress.com)
• Daily Benefactor News - Congressman Thaddeus McCotter Weighing White House Bid (thedaleygator.wordpress.com)