Saturday, February 23, 2013

WILLS: WHY PRIESTS?





I mentioned before that I was awaiting the release of a book by Garry Wills called WHY PRIESTS? A FAILED TRADITION; I just finished reading it.

Garry Wills is a very Catholic author who has penned many books on Catholicism and he is also a Pulitzer Prize winner. Now nearing his 80th birthday, he is still sharp and full of wisdom.

Wills studied for the priesthood for five (5) years but left when he realized that celibacy was not his thing.
I was attracted to the book because it was a “historical” look at the priesthood and not a “personal” one and my knowledge of the actual history of the priesthood was lacking.

The book is actually pretty “heavy” into Biblical analysis but I just want to jot down what I came away with after reading the book.

Wills says that at the outset, there was no Christianity, just Jesus and his followers who were all Jews. Jesus did not start a new religion or “found” a Church; he merely challenged the existing practices of Judaism and especially was very critical of Jewish priests and leaders (Sadducees and Pharisees); neither Jesus nor his Apostles were priests.

St. Paul is usually credited with “inventing” Christianity even though he never met Jesus and had very little contact (mostly disagreements) with Jesus’ original apostles.

Paul’s early concept of Christianity was primarily based on “egalitarianism” where everyone was equal with everyone else; there were no leaders and this early form of Christianity specifically did not want any leaders; just all brothers and sisters in Christ.

Wills points to a late addition to the New Testament called the LETTER TO HEBREWS which was originally credited to Paul but even back then, many did not believe Paul wrote it and today’s bible scholars definitely agree Paul did not write it.

The letter is practically impossible to understand if you are a mere reader; not a biblical scholar but Wills credits the letter (it’s really a long sermon and not a letter) with depicting Jesus as a “sacrificing priest” and as the “sacrifice” itself…

The Letter to Hebrews is the only place in the New Testament where priesthood is mentioned and according to Wills, helped “inject” priesthood into the new religion.

Many people are unaware how the religion was “guided” by placing “letters” in the bible and falsely saying they were written by an “apostle” like Paul or Peter, to give it credence; people were then told that the bible was inspired by God and is the word of God when in truth, mere mortals wrote those words to bend the church to their views.

There were no Christian churches early on and no Mass; “Christians” met at various homes for a meal “breaking bread” together in celebration of the Last Supper and talked about Jesus.

The concept of the Eucharist and “transubstantiation” of the body and blood of Jesus in a “host” wafer that could only be “enacted” by ordained priests came later and was the basis of heavenly “power” granted only to “priests”.

Wills dismisses the idea that Peter was somehow the first priest/bishop of Rome as appointed by Jesus to lead “His” church and all later popes were Peter’s successors; there is no historical evidence that Peter was a Christian or a bishop anywhere and no evidence that Peter was even in Rome at any time in his life despite the movie Quo Vadis and claims he is buried under the Church of St. Peter.

Wills blames the Catholic priesthood for alienating Catholics from the rest of Christianity because Catholic priests are successors of Peter and therefore Jesus and all others are not therefore “invalid” so only Catholics are “true” Christians…historical fabrication?

The Vatican’s “traditions” stand on shaky historical grounds and I have already heard cardinals saying that the new pope must have the power to change those traditions like celibacy since they are only traditions and not divine pronouncements.

Wills basically makes the point that we would be a better religion without priests who were artificially “injected” into a religion that did not want a priesthood and is based on a belief in Jesus who hated priests.
Wills makes an interesting argument but just like pure Communism; we cannot be all equal and someone has to be in charge…at least according to me…but I will agree that things have gone way too far with Catholic hierarchy and things need to change now!






Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

ISLAMORADA, FLORIDA: A short break from the snow


We just got back from ISLAMORADA, FLORIDA which is an island in the middle of the Florida Keys.

We heard about a resort called CHEECA LODGE AND SPA and thought it might be a good place to try.
We usually pick an island in the Caribbean at this time of year but decided we needed a change.

The weather at Islamorada is usually in the 80s at this time but unfortunately we encountered a cold spell for a few days but as you can see from the pictures, the greener was intoxicating and the ability to wear shorts instead of layers and layers of clothing was quite refreshing.

We came back to temperatures in the teens with snow and ice all over the place as usual when you take a vacation in February.

March and Easter is around the corner…


















Wednesday, February 13, 2013

BOTH POPES WERE COMPLICIT IN THE COVER-UP





I watched the documentary MEA MAXIMA CULPA: Silence in the House of God by Alex Gibney about the molestation of deaf boys by Father Lawrence Murphy for over 24 years and the cover-up by Catholic leaders that allowed this crime to continue for so long.

I now feel that Benedict’s abrupt resignation may have something to do with this documentary now that it is being distributed and shown around the world.

Benedict is definitely implicated in a criminal cover-up in this case and many others. The documentary also implicated the Polish Pope John Paul II in cover-ups in other cases; both popes are therefore COMPLICIT in the terrible crimes committed by pedophile priests.

The documentary also points at a reason Benedict put John Paul on an incredibly fast road to sainthood; a road without precedent in church history; Benedict wanted John Paul declared a saint before all the sordid details came out about John Paul protecting molesters, especially MARCIAL MACIEL of the LEGION OF CHRIST.

Benedict knew how bad and evil Marcial Maciel was and he knew full well what he was accused of but could do nothing about it as long as John Paul remained pope and Maciel’s protector. As soon as John Paul died, Benedict immediately moved against Maciel (you can read more about this guy in a 2012 blog).

Benedict’s resignation may only be the tip of the iceberg and hiding in a monastery will not do him any good; the hands of justice will find him as will the wrath of God…at least I hope so.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

THE POPE RESIGNS: Part 2





If Pope Benedict resigned because he is just too old and feels he would not be able to do the job justice than he should be commended for his decision to drop his ego and do what is right for the church and its members.

BUT maybe there is another reason…

I have been made aware of an HBO documentary titled: MEA MAXIMA CULPA: Silence in the House of God by Alex Gibney that was shown on HBO a few weeks ago and will go to area theaters as well.

The documentary details one of the first cases of priestly sexual abuse in the United States that went public. It involves St. John’s School for the Deaf in Milwaukee and Father Lawrence Murphy who for 24 years, raped and molested nearly 200 young deaf boys.

Needless to say, Fr. Murphy remained a free man and a priest until his death in 1998; no punishment whatsoever.

Here is where Pope Benedict or Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger comes in.

Every report of priestly pedophilia went directly to the office of THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH in Rome, which handled all these cases. Cardinal Ratzinger was in charge of this organization and therefore was responsible for investigating these cases and taking appropriate actions in these cases (1981-2005).

As we all know, nothing was done to stop these priests from abusing young boys and in fact a giant cover-up was diligently put into place.

It was when four (4) of the deaf boys molested by Fr. Murphy, now men, sued the Vatican that all hell broke loose and the truth started spilling out.

The complicity of Benedict/Ratzinger may even go back all the way to when he was the Archbishop of Munich, Germany where he moved abuser priests from parish to parish.

So did the pope see the writing on the wall?

Mea Maxima Culpa as we know means “my most maximum/grievous fault” uttered when confessing your sins to God.

As a sitting pope, he would have been immune from criminal prosecution as a head of state but as a retired priest/bishop maybe not.

Does he really want to pay for his sins against humanity?

 A noble gesture it would be to offer himself as a scapegoat for all the priestly sins committed for so long, to be sacrificed on the altar of earthly justice?

Wow!



Enhanced by Zemanta

CONFEDERATE MONUMENTS: Stay or Go...

Another subject that I feel needs some clarification because it is so divisive among us is the issue of Confederate Monuments, why they ...