Thursday, September 22, 2011

UAW: Skip Chrysler?

Chrysler Headquarters in Auburn Hills, Michiga...Image via Wikipedia
Just heard this morning that the UAW is skipping Chrysler and going right after Ford…why?

I told you before that Marchionne of Chrysler is not like those Detroit pussies that give the UAW everything they want; Marchionne marches to a different drummer and he will go to compulsory arbitration rather than to do what he feels is not right for Chrysler; he does not give a shit what GM settled for, times are different now…no more same old shit!

They gave Chrysler an extension on the contract till October so they can concentrate of Ford.

Is Chrysler going to wait and see what Ford does? Don’t forget that Ford can be struck but that would be the death knell for the UAW if it came to that.

More details are coming out about the GM contract and there are some good changes but I still believe GM gave out too much by increasing wages for start-ups which impacts their fixed costs of building autos.

The drama continues…

Enhanced by Zemanta
Ford Motor Company of ArgentinaImage via Wikipedia
Just heard this morning that the UAW is skipping Chrysler and going right after Ford…why?

I told you before that Marchionne of Chrysler is not like those Detroit pussies that give the UAW everything they want; Marchionne marches to a different drummer and he will go to compulsory arbitration rather than to do what he feels is not right for Chrysler; he does not give a shit what GM settled for, times are different now…no more same old shit!

They gave Chrysler an extension on the contract till October so they can concentrate of Ford.

Is Chrysler going to wait and see what Ford does? Don’t forget that Ford can be struck but that would be the death knell for the UAW if it came to that.

More details are coming out about the GM contract and there are some good changes but I still believe GM gave out too much by increasing wages for start-ups which impacts their fixed costs of building autos.

The drama continues…

Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL: Has ended...new military?

Rainbow flag flapping in the wind with blue sk...Image via Wikipedia
The DON’T ASK, DON’T TELL policy about gays in the military has actually come to an end.

Gays in the military can now be openly gay and cannot be drummed out of the military for being gay and gays discharged in the past few years for being gay, can re-apply for reinstatement to the military.

What dooooo it all mean?

I have not made it a secret that I firmly believe that gays are born that way and do not become gay for some reason. For a naturally born heterosexual male (can’t talk for females) to “choose” to become gay is not only absurd but is an insult to everyone’s intelligence.

While I was in the military (1966-1970) homosexuality was not a big thing then but even at my young age (19) and relative naïveté about certain issues, I was aware of some guys being more effeminate than others but now know that they were not gay but just not as manly as other “men” were and for this reason were picked on. In my barracks alone, we had two (2) such individuals hang themselves in the bathroom.

Life is not always fair and our social backwardness has not helped but I am happy to see some progress in my lifetime.

Reading some surveys, it appears that most people in the military did not care much about the issue in the first place; there is always the hard core group. I think older soldiers may still be anti-gay but I think the younger members of the military, as young society in general, have no problem with fellow soldiers being gay.

I have always had a problem with very public displays of affection; but to me that goes for both heterosexual and homosexual individuals and I think there are and have been regulations in place addressing that issue.

I know the military has changed dramatically since I was a member and I hope the transition will be smooth. The military brass has said that all soldiers have been trained in what to expect and they see no problems whatsoever in the military continuing to do its job as always…I do hope so.







Enhanced by Zemanta

PALESTINIANS IN THE U.N.: Good ploy but don't blow it...

International Day of Solidarity with the Pales...Image by United Nations Information Service - Geneva via Flickr
I just have a few words to say about the drama unfolding as we speak at the United Nations.

President Abbas and the Palestinians will be petitioning the United Nations to recognize them as a sovereign nation.

Everyone empathizes with them since their quest to become a sovereign nation has been going on for many generations with no end in sight but the blame for this stalemate cannot be just put on Israel, they both share in the blame.

I hope that this dramatic move on the Palestinian’s side will actually make something happen. I have noticed that French President Sarkozy has actually proposed a time-table to make negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians move swiftly and firmly forward with an end in sight.

What cannot happen is the granting of sovereign status by the U.N. to the Palestinians. Why…because they are NOT a sovereign state and they are not even close to being one and as such, the granting of their wishes would not only be absurd but internationally illegal.

The Palestinians are not one nation, do not have one government and do not have a unified population or a unified “land”; they are not a nation or a state at all; granting them legal status as a nation will cause legal chaos and will make things even worst for both sides.

The U.S. will veto any such motion in the Security Council but they make take it to the General Assembly where it could be voted on.

I hope that the Palestinian plan is just a ploy to finally get both parties to sit down and talk seriously with a definite date for an agreement; this is long overdue and will take both parties to agree to compromises.





Enhanced by Zemanta

FAIR TAXATION: Obama does not know what that means...

President Barack Obama and Warren Buffett in t...Image via Wikipedia
Well we have been having quite a few heated discussions about Obama’s call for “fair” taxation or tax the wealthy more or Buffet’s alternative tax. It seems Obama is misleading many people, including my wife, that somehow the rich or how about the not poor, are not paying their fair amount of taxes. I think some facts are in order.

First, Obama said that he wants millionaires to be taxed at a “higher RATE” than their secretaries, referring to billionaire Warren Buffet.

Higher RATE is not the same as paying more taxes.

Ordinary income which includes WAGES is taxed on a moving scale with 35% reserved for the very top wage earners. Interest income is also taxed as ordinary income. Buffet’s secretary gets taxed on her wages but Buffet makes most of his money NOT from wages but from investment income which is taxed at 15%.

Investment income is when you buy a stock a $5 and sell it for $10; the difference is investment income (if held for 12 months or more) or if your mutual fund distributes capital gains which are also investment income taxed at 15%.

Why 15%? Because the government wants to encourage investment in stocks, etc. which help companies raise capital to start a business (IPO) or grow a business which usually translates to more jobs. If you raise the rate on investment income, fewer people will invest and that will stymie growth; it’s that simple.

The facts also state that 10% of the highest earners pay more than 50% of all federal taxes (70% of federal income taxes according to the Congressional Budget Office). Also 46% of low and medium income families will pay NO federal income taxes.

Obama is desperate to soak the rich and he is trying to paint a picture of the “rich” not paying their “fair” share but that is simply not true as evidenced by recorded facts.

If you want “fair” you need to take out ALL tax exemptions for everybody and just have a basic “flat” rate based on your income. Right now our TAX CODE has more than $1 Trillion in deductions, exemptions and credits and benefit ALL taxpayers, no matter what their income and most of us have gotten used to these benefits (like a mortgage interest deduction) but hey, you want to be fair Obama, then have some balls and make it “really” fair.

In a basic flat rate, tax rates would be much lower than now and they would be based on amounts earned.

The Republicans are correct in saying that Obama is trying to start a class war; poor against the rich and why... because the election is coming in 2012.

He appears to have given up on trying to work with the Republicans (and for very good reason…they don’t want to do what is good for the country; they just want to win in 2012) and is therefore positioning “himself” against “them” and making them to be the villains by protecting the rich while hurting the poor.

There are things Obama can do to help the economy but he can’t seem to get any good advice or as some say, he is unwilling to take good advice and just goes his own way which, as we can see, is the wrong way.







Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 18, 2011

IRISH CATHOLICS: Have had enough...

Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont of 10...Image via Wikipedia
I was surprised to see another article in the New York Times about the strained relations between Ireland and the Vatican.

The article under “News Analysis” was titled: A RUPTURE OF REVERENCE FOR THE VATICAN SETS OFF A TRANSFORMATION IN IRELAND by Sarah Lyall (9-18-2011).

I guess what is happening between Ireland and the Vatican is truly historic. Ireland is as Catholic as they come. Hell, divorce was only legalized here in 1995; can you even believe that? Irish and Catholic are synonymous where 87% of the population is Catholic and 90% of primary schools are run by the Catholic Church.

These mega Catholics now only feel rage, disgust and defiance towards the Church and the Vatican where they have had nothing but humble reverence for ages. Never has an Irish leader showed such outrage and indignation towards the Church.

As you all know by now, the rage is fueled by priestly abuse of children in Ireland but most of all by the Vatican’s cover up of the abuse as I have mentioned many times over before.

Enda Kenney, the Irish prime minister said “The rape and torture of children were downplayed to uphold instead the primacy of the institution – its power, standing and its reputation.”

The Catholic Church has dictated the social policies of Ireland basically forever but now Ireland is declaring that the Church will follow the laws of Ireland and not its own canon law; there is only one law and that is the law of Ireland.

I see a change taking place of historical proportions. I know the Church has survived many of such upheavals and is still standing but I sense a difference now. I sense a “rupture of reverence” between Catholics and their leaders which I hope will lead to another transformation in the Catholic Church because it really needs to be transformed.

Enhanced by Zemanta

GM / UAW DEAL: Too much for these times...

Logo of General Motors Corporation. Source: 20...Image via Wikipedia
It appears that the UAW and GM have reached a tentative deal on a new four year contract. The initial buzz is that it a win-win situation for both the UAW and GM. Since no details have been officially announced, we have to settle for some carefully leaked rumors.

I have maintained that the auto companies could not add to their fixed costs of producing cars but it appears GM did just that by agreeing to raise the wages for new hires by $3 / hour which does not appear to be a great deal BUT it still adds to the fixed cost of building an auto.

Enlarging the profit sharing formula was expected and should have been the only concession of GM.

Also expected was a promise to invest in U.S. plants and not to outsource which is a huge deal for job security for U.S. workers.

Giving all workers a signing bonus of $5,000 was a mistake even though it does not add to fixed costs. It could actually help the local economy as workers blow $5,000 on “stuff”. It was a mistake because I did not read about any concessions on the UAW part such as higher co-pays in their healthcare coverage, etc.

Usually, what is agreed with one company (GM) is now offered to Ford and Chrysler to accept and in this way all UAW workers get basically the same.

Since the American taxpayer bailed out GM and Chrysler and for that matter, the UAW, I do not see this as a fair contract where with unemployment up in Michigan to over 11%, workers are getting bonuses for just signing a contract (which they still have to approve).

GM should have stuck to giving the UAW job security and a bigger profit sharing slice and that should be enough for the union in these tough economic times.

I hope Ford and Chrysler work out their own contracts without increasing wages for new hires and no signing bonus; just be grateful you have a job!

I will be waiting for the fallout to come…

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, September 16, 2011

AUTO TALKS: Binding arbitration only solution...

Sergio MarchionneImage via Wikipedia
Detroit is all abuzz about the UAW contract talks with the Big Three auto makers because the deadlines have passed and still no deal and something is starting to smell…

The UAW extended the contract with Ford and the talks came to a stop there. It intensified the talks with GM and Chrysler but had to also extend the contract deadline and this morning we learn that Sergio Marchionne, head of Chrysler, released a letter to Bob King of the UAW saying basically, we had a deal so why are you fuckin’ around with this contract.

Marchionne is not from Detroit, he is from Fiat/Italy and he does not know or give a shit, how things work in Detroit, he knows what he wants and he doesn’t mince words talking about what he wants and expects…love this guy.

The usual in Detroit, is that the UAW picks a “strike target” and negotiates a contract with that strike target only (not all three at once as it is trying to do now). Once it gets its contract with the strike target it takes the same contract to the other two and tells them to sign on the dotted line.

This year it is totally different and historic. The UAW can only strike Ford and have put those talks on hold while it gets a contract signed by Chrysler and GM which they will then take to Ford who must sign it or it will be struck.

But Marchionne doesn’t care about Ford or GM, he only cares about Chrysler and I think he wants a “custom” deal with Chrysler. He has already said what he will agree to offer and that is that. He is offering bigger profit-sharing checks, investing in existing plants which will create more second tier union jobs but no additions to fixed costs which means no raises, no bonuses but job security.

The workers want raises, they want a $10,000 per worker contract signing bonus and they want all their benefits back, the ones they gave up to save their jobs during the bankruptcy crisis. They obviously have not learned anything from the time the all were nearly out on the street.

If they two sides do not come to terms they go into “binding arbitration”; a stranger tells them what to do and that is that. I feel the UAW will come out with the short end of the stick if talks go into binding arbitration.

Bob King but not his workers, knows the world is watching. If the auto makers give in to the UAW’s exorbitant demands, Wall Street will crush their stock prices, Obama will definitely be thrown out of office and his Republican replacement will kick both the auto makers and the UAW’s asses, the UAW will not be able to unionize another auto company and the nation will be so anti-union that the union’s demise will be greatly accelerated.

Bob King is between a rock and a hard place with no wiggle room…it must go to binding arbitration because only when that happens he will be off the hook with his UAW members and with the auto makers; it will be out of his hands.





Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

RICK PERRY: Attacked but not smitten...

Perry Event 2/1/2010Image via Wikipedia
No doubt you have been hearing about the clashes among the GOP presidential candidates during debates that can make them or break them.

Rick Perry would never be a candidate I could ever vote for mainly because he is a religious nut case and a Neanderthal on social issues but he has charisma and he does not back down from a taken position like Romney does.

The other candidates jumped on Perry because he called Social Security a Ponzi scheme. Well it is. Ponzi would pay investors with money he would collect from new investors and kept that up until the whole thing collapsed. Social Security pays retired workers with money supplied by new workers or actively employed workers. Since costs have been going up constantly, there will be a point where more money is going out than coming in at which point the whole scheme becomes unsustainable.

Perry, it seems, is just saying that things need to be fixed or altered in the Social Security system or the system will fail. We all know that but I think he went out of his way to scare the hell out of people that will depend on Social Security as their ONLY pension benefit and now has to explain himself and exactly what he intends to do.

He was attacked for mandating the vaccine against cervical cancer for every little girl in Texas. Legally mandating the vaccine probably was over the line at that time but today, the vaccine is a proven entity that is absolutely a benefit to the health of all women and should be given to all girls at age 12.

Michelle Bachmann attacked Perry for forcing a vaccine that could potentially harm girls, echoing the moronic and very harmful nonsense promoted by Jenny McCarthy saying the preservative in vaccines (thymersol) causes autism.

McCarthy persuaded countless parents not to vaccinate their children causing disease we thought we wiped out, to re-emerge again endangering children’s lives based on information by a rogue researcher that has been prosecuted for fabricating his data just to get back at pharmaceutical companies or something to that effect.

Bachmann, never the one with all he facts straight, tried to defend her position saying she met a woman that told her, her daughter became ill after getting the vaccine against cervical cancer; she believed one strangers account? This is what she would base her actions on…rumors?

Bachmann then accused Perry of ordering the vaccines because he got a big donation from the company making the vaccine. He did get a donation but was that his motivation? Perry said he just wanted to prevent cancer!

All I can say is that the debates are interesting but oh so sad…






Enhanced by Zemanta

POPE & VATICAN: Charged with crimes against humanity...

Pope Benedictus XVIImage via Wikipedia
I have had a few stories about the Vatican and priestly abuse of children to report on and the time is now.

The first article was in the New York Times 9/4/2011 titled: “Vatican Denies Claims by Ireland on Abuse”…Church Says It Did Not Hinder Inquiries.

In essence, the Irish government accused the Vatican of encouraging priests and bishops NOT to report cases of abuse to the local police. The evidence was a secret letter sent from the Vatican ambassador in Ireland where he stated that he had “serious reservations” about the government guidelines of reporting abuse and termed the guidelines as violating Canon Law.

You can see why this letter would be “evidence” of a “cover-up”. The Irish government also issued a report where they provided evidence of predatory priests being moved from one parish to another by bishops that knew full well they were abusing children.

The Irish government is now debating whether to pass a law which would make failure to report allegations of abuse to local police, a crime punishable by jail time.

As the Vatican lamely defends itself in the face of insurmountable evidence of a cover-up and NO Roman Catholic leaders being prosecuted and punished for actively covering up child abuse, I read the headline “Clergy Sex Abuse Victims File International Court case Against Pope.” The survivors of priestly abuse network are seeking an investigation of the Vatican and top Vatican leaders for possible crimes against humanity.

They named the pope as a defendant, among others, since he was the leader of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which in 2001 was in charge of overseeing abuse cases.

Crimes against humanity include rape, sexual violence and torture according to an international treaty which mandates the international court’s actions.

The Survivors Network said that the Church is still in denial and has not punished those that abetted the abuse and has not moved to categorically end abuse which they claim continues to this very day around the world.

I am glad to see that governments and citizens are not letting the Vatican off the hook for crimes against humanity and allowing the Church to move on as if nothing has happened (denial) and to continue to proclaim itself as the representative of God on earth; how sick is that?





Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 11, 2011

AMERICAN RED CROSS: Union employees call strike...

Flag of the Red CrossImage via Wikipedia
Here in Michigan, unionized Red Cross workers went on strike. I didn’t know Red Cross had unionized workers.

It seems that blood drives held on 9/11, especially this 9/11 (10th Anniversary) bring in the most blood donors. The unions struck before that anniversary but went back to work temporarily when Red Cross officials agreed to pay the workers for their time while striking? Does this even make sense or does the Red Cross have no choice but to do what the unions ask or lose out on their biggest blood donor day.

It seems the national Red Cross organization has had to make some changes, like most companies during this recession, to the benefits it pays its workers. It appears that the unionized workers in Michigan don’t like those changes so their striking.

The American Red Cross collects blood donations from the public and sells those units to hospitals, etc. Since blood has an expiration date, those collections have to be on-going.

Should workers involved in producing a life saving product be allowed to strike? Why did the Red Cross even allow unionization knowing full well that a strike could not only cripple the company but endanger the public?

I thought the Red Cross is a non-profit organization that helps during disasters, what the hell is it doing with unionized workers? See how much I know about the organization even though I have worked in hospital blood banks and have collected blood units in emergency situations.

Enhanced by Zemanta

LONGSHOREMEN UNION: Hire us or we will kill you...

Color logo of the National Labor Relations Boa...Image via Wikipedia
I have been talking about the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) and how pro union they are even though they are supposed to be neutral and investigate ALL unfair labor practices.

Well in one case, even the NLRB could not look the other way when THIS union “misbehaved”?

It appears that LONGSHORE UNION workers on the West Coast in Washington state stormed the Port of Longview, Washington, overpowering security guards, damaging rail cars, dumping grain, breaking down gates, smashing windows, cutting break lines, pushing security vehicles into ditches and taking the security guards hostage…500 longshoremen at 4:30 AM did all that…no arrests were made…I guess they were pissed at something…labor dispute?

Whatever the labor dispute, it also stopped work at four (4) other ports.

The dispute was actually about a new port and a new company at the port that did not want to hire union workers but later hired a contractor that will use workers from another union...get the point...hire us or we will kill you...yes death threats were made...or we will destroy you...well now, what do we think about that approach to expanding union power.



Enhanced by Zemanta

OBAMA'S JOB SPEECH: Good speech but...

Official presidential portrait of Barack Obama...Image via Wikipedia
I did not watch Obama’s jobs speech; I couldn’t.

He really knows how to give a speech and he does sound convincing but I know better; most of the time his words are just that, words.

I will quickly add that the Republicans do not have any solid ideas either about job creation, they just oppose everything Obama suggests and hope the economy stays stalled until election time when people will be forced to try someone other than Obama, hoping change will somehow translate into progress…it won’t…the economy will get better naturally with time.

So is there nothing our government can do to turn the economy around? Well there is no magic bullet out there but there are many little things that our government can do to “help” the economy create more jobs…more on that in a later blog.

Jobs are created when businesses hire people to satisfy an increase in “consumer demand” for whatever it is that businesses are providing. Consumer demand is at an all time low because people are scared to spend money they may need if things get worst.

Obama suggested a deeper cut in employee payroll taxes. This would put a few more dollars in people’s pay checks. This multiplied by millions of people would put more dollars into the economy providing people spend those dollars and not just use them to pay down their credit card debt; people buy more stuff, businesses make more stuff.

Giving tax breaks to businesses that hire the unemployed is just plain silly. Businesses will hire people when they need people and not because of a tax break and they will need more people when the consumer is buying more of the business’s stuff and not before.

I am conflicted about extending unemployment benefits mainly because of personal experience. My company offered jobs to a few people that were unemployed but the offers were rejected as soon as the workers heard that their jobless benefits were extended so I do believe that extending these benefits may discourage “some” people from seriously looking for employment.

But as my wife points out, there are more people out there, eager to work but just unable to find employment and they really do need the unemployment benefits and the benefits do put more dollars into the economy.

As to fixing our roads, bridges and schools and creating all those construction jobs…that was suppose to happen with the first stimulus package and it didn’t…why?

Like I said…nice speech but…











Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, September 08, 2011

UAW: Middle-class living wages unrealistic...

United Auto WorkersImage via Wikipedia
Our newspapers here in Detroit are filled with news and speculation about the UAW and their contract talks with the BIG 3; that is what we do in Detroit and have done it for decades.

This year is different as I have explained numerous times but Bob King, president of the UAW, seems to be harping on the same thing and that is in his own words “…and I think there is a common desire to make sure that everybody working for the industry is at a middle-class standard of living.”

He is referring about the $14-$16/hour wage for new hires; he wants them up to the old hires wage of $28-$30 / hour which would place them in that middle-class type of living.

I think King is saying that because he has to appear to the rank and file, that he is trying to do what they want him to do even if he knows that is not the way to go and cannot be the way to go. The upper wage earners need to be bought out and all workers will be at the entry level rate, why?

Well, as King and anybody else that knows the minimum about how businesses run, knows that a company that makes a product has to price the product to be competitive in the market filled with similar products.

The price of the product is the fixed factor otherwise the product does not sell. The UAW is asking the company to make wages the fixed factor saying in effect, we want our wages to be $30 / hour and you manipulate your selling price to accommodate those wages…which is patently absurd.

So let’s get back to the concept of the middle class which I have addressed before but it keeps coming up. I said that UAW workers (un-educated, un-skilled) have been in pseudo-middle class for decades because the unions were able to provide that to their workers; they no longer can do that and now the workers will have to find their natural economic class based on their education and skills.

I have watched debates on CNN where the “experts” have said the erosion of the middle class, as we have known it, has been going on for some time. More and more, the ticket to the middle-class is an education and/ or specialized skill usually obtained through alternative educational means like on-the-job training, apprenticeship, etc. In other words, the days of the unskilled and uneducated, enjoying a middle class standard of living appears to be coming to an end…

BUT in our current depression, even an education and a skill set does not appear to be an automatic ticket to middle-class living; they can’t find jobs that will place them in the middle-class standard of living.

So we are back to the lack of jobs in our economy and what can be done to create some and many people are talking about just that and the president will address the nation about that tonight BUT I am skeptical he has a plan that will work but I will listen.

Getting back to the UAW and their attempts to keep the status quo they have enjoyed for decades, alive…you need to face economic reality…if the autos you build are uncompetitive in the market because of high production costs brought on by excessive labor costs; the autos will not sell and you will be out of a job period!




Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 07, 2011

NLRB: Absurd abuse of power and Obama knows it...

Union members picketing outside the National L...Image via Wikipedia
To show you how absurd the situation has become with the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (NLRB) and their mission to allow unions to organize businesses faster and without obstacles put up by private business, they passed a ruling directing all private employers to post a poster where workers can easily see and read it, informing their workers of their rights to unionize and instruct them how to unionize.

The board’s main purpose is to investigate unfair labor practice allegations by unions or workers. The board is obviously now a partner of unions and will do anything to raise the number of union workers in the private sector which now stands at below 7% of all workers in the private sector and that number is falling fast.

The absurdity here is the naked abuse of power by the board to further union goals by abusing the rights of private businesses.

It is as if the board is saying, we don’t give a shit about job creation unless it is union job creation. Obama, by supporting the NLRB, in essence, is saying the same thing.

Obama will propose a big highway and bridge construction bill on Thursday to help create jobs. I am already hearing grumbling on the GOP side because those construction jobs are slated only for union construction workers and as such should not be allowed to pass unless all workers have a fair chance at getting those jobs. 

Enhanced by Zemanta

LABOR DAY IN DETROIT: Hoffa threatens Tea Party...

Jimmy HoffaImage via Wikipedia
As you know, the president spoke in Detroit at our Labor Day festivities. I did not expect much from his speech and his speech proved to be really nothing; all the same buzz words to excite the labor crowd but no substance.

The mayor of Detroit, Dave Bing, was not invited because he is not a friend of labor, promising to privatize most city services since the fat ass unionists seem allergic to work but still want to get their benefits and security of employment…Bing will do what is necessary!

JIMMY HOFFA, the Teamster president that is suing Obama came out swinging at the Tea Party saying “take those sons-of-bitches out”. Remember that Jimmy Hoffa’s father, the elder Jimmy Hoffa, spent time in jail for dealings with the mob and was known as a tough guy that didn’t mind mixing it up when called for; his body has not been found since he disappeared many years ago.

Hoffa did not apologize for his remarks, he merely said that he was talking about”taking them out” by voting against them and not actually “rubbing them out”.

Well obviously the GOP jumped on that statement, reminding voters of the violent history of the Teamsters, mob ties, corruption, etc. which reflects badly on all unions whose members can get violent if they don’t get their way.

Palin called Hoffa’s remarks THUGGERY and she would be correct.

I told Obama to skip this union love fest; he should have listened.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 04, 2011

DETROIT JAZZ FESTIVAL: Music of peace...





Just got back from attending the Detroit Jazz Festival where my son Zak was featured in the “Jazz Talk Tent” interviewing jazz artists from Mali, Israel and Azerbaijan. The point of the interview was to discuss how people from such diverse geographical areas wound up as jazz musicians, playing here in Detroit.

It was quite an interesting discussion and we as a nation have to be proud, how an American musical invention has captivated the world and has actually become an agent of peace, bringing together musicians from all around the world to just play jazz …together…in peace and harmony.

I love jazz but am baffled how anyone can write actual jazz pieces because it all sounds so impromptu and the drummers, wow how can they drum so well without a steady beat?

It is always fun to watch a jazz audience because it is so diverse and so different…

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, September 03, 2011

TEAMSTERS: A union filed a suit against Obama?

US truck - California 2007Image via Wikipedia
I have been saying that Obama is such a union man that I may not be able to vote for him but some unions don’t like him and actually have just filed a suit against his administration.

The TEAMSTERS union has filed a suit in yet another attempt to block Mexican trucks from entering the United States.

If you remember, we passed NAFTA (The North American Free Trade Agreement) in 1994; that’s a long time ago and YES, WE passed it but we didn’t mean it?

It allowed Mexican trucks to deliver goods into the U.S. as American trucks were allowed to deliver goods into Mexico. Well the Teamsters did not like that so they paid off the Democrats to block this passed legislation for nearly 20 years!

The Teamsters preferred the Mexican truck drivers unload their goods at the border and Teamster truckers would then pick the goods up and deliver them in the U.S. Well that makes no business sense at all and all it does is enrich the Teamsters at the expense of the businesses doing the importing of goods from Mexico.

The Teamsters used all sorts of lies to block the legislation. First they said Mexican trucks were unsafe which a study proved absolutely false and in fact, the Mexican trucks were safer than the Teamster trucks.

Then they said that the Mexican truck drivers didn’t speak English well enough to drive safely in the U.S. That is total bull and of course Teamster drivers not only cannot speak Spanish, some of them barely speak English.

Here is why Obama had to allow the legislation to proceed as agreed to in 1994; Mexico was allowed by the NAFTA treaty to impose punitive tariffs against American goods coming into Mexico IF the deal was not enacted.

Well since 2009, $2.4 Billion in U.S. goods slated for export to Mexico have been affected and in some cases blocked ANNUALLY, yes that is every year.

A loss of $2.4 billion in exports means LOST AMERICAN JOBS all because the Teamsters are some greedy-ass twits.

If Obama wants to create more jobs in the U.S., he has to stop coddling the Teamsters who are in effect, costing Americans jobs; this is a good example of the tail waging the dog.

Hoffa of the Teamsters argues that his truck drivers will lose some business if Mexican drivers are allowed to drive into the U.S. and as we know; it is all about the Teamsters and screw everyone else.

Can you believe that a union has so much power that they can block an agreement signed by the U.S. government since 1994? Something definitely wrong with that!

Obama, on the other hand, can redeem himself somewhat, IF he enacts this treaty that he agreed to and the rest of the trade agreements with South Korea, Columbia and Panama that are also being blocked by the unions…let us see if Obama can do what is RIGHT or is he a union puppet.




Enhanced by Zemanta

FORD & UAW: Historic crossroads...

Left to right: Bob King, UAW Vice President; R...Image via Wikipedia
I have been commenting on the on-going UAW (United Auto Workers) union contract talks with the auto manufacturers. I have been watching the FORD talks more closely since Ford is the only company the unions can legally strike at this time.

A strike vote has been taken at Ford and workers there have overwhelmingly gave the go-ahead to strike.

I have been also saying how there might be a disconnect between UAW leadership (Bob King) and the rank and file (workers).

I have mentioned that a generous profit sharing plan should give workers that extra money they want BUT it seems that is not ENOUGH according to this morning’s news. Gary Walkowicz, bargaining committeeman for local 600 at DEARBORN TRUCK plant (F-150s) said that workers are FED UP with concessions and with THEIR OWN UNION LEADERSHIP and want THEIR FORTUNES RESTORED.

Some in the UAW (very few) are touting job security as the main issue. They say that many workers forgot that they nearly lost their jobs for good a short time ago but this is the mind-set at Ford; we want more and more and more…right now or we strike your ass.

Ford cannot afford a strike but it also cannot allow the UAW to blackmail it into submission thus endangering their future viability.

The UAW cannot legally strike GM and Chrysler and so a strike at Ford Motor could shift market share to GM and Chrysler and Ford is aware of the fact that once a customer switches brands, it is very hard to bring that customer back.

The UAW, as always, has the upper hand because they have a weapon (strike) whereas Ford does not. But Ford could weather a strike for some time using up whatever inventory they have and Ford could also bring in autos from their plants overseas and in Mexico unfortunately, Ford’s best seller (F-150) is built right here in Dearborn, MI.

A prolonged strike would also deplete the UAW’s strike fund and workers would be forced to dip into their own money.

A prolonged strike would also make Ford think about moving their production facilities into right-to-work states like the foreign manufacturers did or expand overseas. The bottom line is that the UAW would be shooting themselves in the head if they strike, no matter what.

If the UAW strikes Ford, the public opinion in this country which is already anti-union, will be rabidly anti-union and could lead to a Republican victory in 2012 and believe me, the GOP will use this union strike issue to their advantage.

President Obama is scheduled to speak here on LABOR DAY as many Democratic presidents and presidential candidates have done fort many years. I think it is a mistake for Obama to show himself as such a huge union guy since his unabashed union promotion has already turned many against him and as in my case, would have me vote Republican or not vote at all if the Republican candidate is someone other than John Huntsman.



Enhanced by Zemanta

CONFEDERATE MONUMENTS: Stay or Go...

Another subject that I feel needs some clarification because it is so divisive among us is the issue of Confederate Monuments, why they ...